UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

NOTICE OF THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING

FOR THE
APRIL 25, 2017
ANNUAL SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING

Dear Shareholder:Items of Business:

        You are cordially invited

1.

Electing four directors of the Company to attend Valmont's annual meetingthree-year terms;



2.

Advisory approval of shareholders on Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 1:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at Valmont's headquarters at One Valmont Plaza in Omaha, Nebraska.

the Company's executive compensation;



3.

Ratifying the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for fiscal 2020; and



4.

Consider and act upon such other business that may properly come before the meeting.

        The formalrecord date for determining which shareholders may vote at this meeting of shareholders will be followed by a review of Valmont's business operations and our outlook for the future. Following the meeting, you are invited to an informal reception where you can visit with the directors and officers about the activities of the Company.is March 6, 2020.

        We are pleased to furnishdistributing our proxy materials to youour shareholders primarily over the Internet. We believe that this e-proxy process should expedite shareholders' receipt of proxy materials, while also lowering the costs and reducing the environmental impact of our annual meeting. On March 15, 2017,19, 2020, we mailed to many of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and annual report and vote online. Those shareholders who do not receive such a Notice, including shareholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of proxy materials, will receive a copy of the proxy statement, proxy card, and annual report by mail. The proxy statement contains instructions on how you can (i) receive a paper copy of the proxy statement, proxy card, and annual report, if you only received a Notice by mail, or (ii) elect to receive your proxy statement, proxy card, and annual report over the Internet next year, if you received them by mail this year.

        Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, your vote is important and we encourage you to vote promptly. You may vote your shares via a toll-free telephone number or over the Internet. If you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, you may vote by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the envelope provided. Instructions regarding these three methods of voting are contained on the Notice and the proxy card. If you hold your shares through an account with a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, please follow the instructions you receive from them to vote your shares.

        The formal meeting of shareholders will be followed by a review of Valmont's business operations and our outlook for the future. Following the meeting, you are invited to an informal reception where you can visit with the directors and officers about the activities of the Company.

I look forward to seeing you at our annual meeting.

		Sincerely,
		Mogens C. Bay Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Valmont Industries, Inc.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS

        Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of shareholders of Valmont Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held at Valmont's headquarters, One Valmont Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska, on Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 1:00 p.m. local time for the purpose of:

(1)

Electing three directors of the Company to three year terms.



(2)

Advisory approval of the Company's executive compensation.



(3)

Advisory vote on the frequency of executive compensation votes.



(4)

Ratifying the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for fiscal 2017.



(5)

Transacting such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

        Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2017 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

Your vote is important. Please note that if you hold your shares through a broker, your broker may no longer vote your shares on certain matters in the absence of your specific instructions as to how to vote. In order for your vote to be counted, please make sure that you submit your vote to your broker.

        Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote your shares via the toll-free telephone number or over the Internet. If you received a copy of the proxy card by mail, you may sign, date and mail the proxy card in the envelope provided. Instructions regarding these three methods of voting are contained on the Notice and the proxy card. If you hold your shares through an account with a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, please follow the instructions you receive from them to vote your shares.

		By Order of the Board of Directors
		Mark C. Jaksich Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

TIME AND PLACE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING

When: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 1 p.m. Central Time
Where: Valmont Headquarters, Omaha Nebraska

MEETING AGENDA

HOW TO VOTE

        We encourage you to vote at your earliest convenience, by one of the following means, before the Annual Meeting

•

By visiting proxyvote.com on the Internet through your computer or mobile device,



•

By calling 1-800-690-6903, or



•

By signing, dating and returning your proxy card, if you receive your proxy materials by mail.

Pleased vote as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting.

PROXY STATEMENT

To Our Shareholders:

        The board of directors of Valmont Industries, Inc. solicits your proxy in the form enclosed for use at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on Tuesday, April 25, 2017,28, 2020, or at any adjournments thereof.

        At the close of business on March 1, 2017,6, 2020, the record date for shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting, there were outstanding 22,557,82821,523,917 shares of the Company's common stock. There were no preferred shares outstanding. All holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of stock held by them.

        The presence of a majority of the outstanding common stock represented in person or by proxy at the meeting will constitute a quorum. Shares represented by proxies that are marked "abstain" will be counted as shares present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Proxies relating to "street name" shares that are voted by brokers on some matters will be treated as shares present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but will not be treated as shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting on those matters as to which authority to vote is withheld by the broker ("broker non-votes").Please note that if you hold your shares through a broker, your broker may no longer vote your shares on certain matters in the absence of your specific instructions as to how to vote. In order for your vote to be counted, please make sure that you submit your vote to your broker.

        Election of the threefour director nominees requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast for the election of directors at the annual meeting. Votes may be cast in favor of or withheld with respect to all of the director nominees, or any of them. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not treated as votes cast and therefore will not affect the outcome of the election of directors. An incumbent director nominee who receives a greater number of votes "withheld" than "for" in an election is required to tender his resignation to the board, and the resignation will be accepted or rejected by the board as more fully described in Election of Directors.

        The proposals to approve the ratification of the appointment of the auditors and the approval of the advisory say-on-pay resolution on executive compensation will be decided by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. Abstentions will be counted; they will have the same effect as a vote against the matter. Broker non-votes will be disregarded.

        The say-on-pay frequency option that receives the highest number of votes cast by holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote will be the advisory shareholder selection for the frequency of holding executive compensation votes. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no impact on the selection of the frequency option.

        Any shareholder giving a proxy may revoke it before the meeting whether delivered by telephone, Internet or through the mail, by using the telephone voting procedures, the Internet voting procedures or by mailing a signed instrument revoking the proxy to: Corporate Secretary, Valmont Industries, Inc., One Valmont Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska 68154-5215. To be effective, a mailed revocation must be received by the Corporate Secretary before the date of the meeting and a telephonic or Internet revocation must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 24, 2017.27, 2020. A shareholder may attend the meeting in person and at that time withdraw the proxy and vote in person.

        As permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission rules, Valmont is making this proxy statement and its annual report available to its stockholders electronically via the Internet. On March 15, 2017,19, 2020, we mailed to many of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our annual report and to vote online. If you received such a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy

materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy statement and annual report. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy over the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials contained on the Notice.

        The Securities and Exchange Commission's rules permit us to deliver a single Notice or set of this proxy statement and our annual report to one address shared by two or more of our shareholders. This delivery method is referred to as "householding" and can result in significant cost savings. To take advantage of this opportunity, we have delivered only one Notice or set of this proxy statement and our annual report to multiple shareholders who share an address, unless we received contrary instructions from such shareholders prior to the mailing date. We agree to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Notice or a set of this proxy statement and our annual report, as requested, to any shareholder at the shared address to which a single copy of those documents was delivered. If you prefer to receive separate copies of the Notice or this proxy statement and our annual report, contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. at 1-800-542-10611-800-579-1639 or in writingby email at Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.sendmaterial@proxyvote.com.

        The cost of solicitation of proxies, including the cost of reimbursing banks and brokers for forwarding proxy materials to their principals, will be borne by the Company.

Certain Shareholders

        The following table sets forth, as of March 1, 2017,6, 2020, the number of shares beneficially owned by (i) persons known to the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company's outstanding common stock, (ii) executive officers named in the summary compensation table, (iii) directors, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group.

Includes 964 restricted stock units held byfor each of the directors (other than director Kaniewski) which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2017 as follows: 835 restricted stock units for Mr. Freye and 911 restricted stock units for each other director (other than Mr. Bay).6, 2020.

(2)

Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership of any named individual does not exceed 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.

(3)

Based on a Schedule 13G filed by The Vanguard Group with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2020.

(4)

Based on a Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2017.February 6, 2020.

(4)(5)

Based on a Schedule 13G filed by T. Rowe Price Associates with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2017.

Corporate Governance

        Valmont is committed to having strong corporate governance principles. The board of directors believes such principles are essential to the effective operation of Valmont's businesses and to maintaining Valmont's integrity in the marketplace.

Overview

        The board of directors has adopted corporate governance principles which are set out in the "Investor Relations" section of the Company's website atwww.valmont.com. The following corporate governance documents also appear on the Company's website and these documents and the Company's Corporate Governance Principles are available in print to any shareholder upon request to the Corporate Secretary:

•

Code of Business Conduct



•

Code of Ethics for Senior Officers



•

Audit Committee Charter



•

Human Resources Committee Charter



•

Governance and Nominating Committee Charter



•

Procedures for bringing concerns or complaints to the attention of the Audit Committee

        The board met five times over eight days during 2016. All directors attended at least 75% of all board meetings and all meetings of Committees on which the director served. Directors are encouraged to attend the annual shareholders' meeting and all Company directors attended the 2016 annual shareholders' meeting. The board of directors periodically reviews the Corporate Governance Principles and any changes are communicated to shareholders by posting them on the Company's website.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

        The board's leadership structure consists of a Chairman and a Lead Director. The Chairman is also the Chief Executive Officer. The board believes this combined role promotes unified leadership and direction for the board and executive management and allows for a single clear focus for the chain of command to execute the Company's strategic initiatives and business plans. The board does not believe the combined role adversely affects the independence of the board. All board members have substantial business experience and all board members, with the exception of the Chief Executive Officer, are independent within the meaning of the Company's corporate governance principles and the NYSE Listing Standards. The Company's independent directors meet in executive session without management present at every board meeting. The Chief Executive Officer periodically updates the board on succession planning for key officers and the board reviews CEO succession planning in detail annually at its July meeting.

        The board has established the position of Lead Director. The position is filled by independent director Kenneth E. Stinson. The lead director presides at executive sessions of the independent

directors, serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer, and has the ability to call meetings of the independent directors. Interested parties who wish to contact the board of directors or the lead director may communicate through the lead director by writing to: Lead Director of Valmont Board of Directors, Valmont Industries, Inc., One Valmont Plaza, Suite 601, Omaha, Nebraska, 68154-5215.

        The board has oversight responsibility for risks affecting the Company. The board has delegated risk oversight with respect to operational, compliance and financial matters to the Audit Committee and has delegated risk oversight with respect to compensation matters to the Human Resources Committee.

Governance Actions

        The board of directors and board committees have taken a number of corporate governance actions. The more significant actions include:

•

The board of directors has approved bylaws which adopt a majority voting system for the election of directors.



•

The board of directors has adopted director stock ownership guidelines. The guidelines provide that directors should own Valmont common stock with a value at least equal to five times the director's annual retainer. Directors have five years after joining the board to meet the guidelines.



•

The board of directors has adopted stock ownership and retention guidelines for senior management. The guidelines require an equity position having a value of six times base salary for the Chief Executive Officer, three times base salary for the Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Group Presidents, and two times base salary for other corporate officers. The officers are required to retain 75% of the net shares acquired upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock until the stock ownership guidelines have been attained and maintained. The Company also has a policy prohibiting stock hedging and stock pledges applicable to directors and officers.



•

The board of directors has adopted an executive compensation recoupment policy. The policy generally provides that if Valmont is required to restate its financial statements, due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements, the board of directors may require reimbursement of all or any part of any cash or stock award based on an incentive plan that relates to the performance of Valmont, if the employee engaged in certain conduct which caused or contributed to the need for the restatement. The board of directors has the right to apply the recoupment policy in all cases to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Group President (if the conduct occurred in the Group) if an employee engaged in the designated conduct.



•

The Human Resources Committee has engaged Frederick W. Cook & Co. ("Cook") as its independent executive compensation consulting firm. The Company does not engage Cook for any services beyond their support of the Human Resources Committee.



•

The board of directors in December 2005 permitted the Company's Shareholder Rights Plan to expire, effectively terminating the Shareholder Rights Plan.

Board Independence

        The board of directors is composed of a majority of independent directors. The board has established independence standards for Valmont's directors. These standards are set forth below and

are contained in the Company's Corporate Governance Principles and follow the director independence standards established by the New York Stock Exchange:

•

A director will not be independent if, within the preceding three years (1) the director was employed by Valmont or an immediate family member of the director was an executive officer of Valmont, (2) a Valmont executive officer was on the compensation committee of the board of directors of a company which employed the Valmont director as an executive officer or which employed an immediate family member of the director as an executive officer, or (3) the director or the director's immediate family member received more than $120,000 during any twelve-month period in direct compensation from Valmont (other than director and committee fees).



•

A director will not be independent if (1) the director is an executive officer or an employee, or the director's immediate family member is an executive officer, of another company and (2) the other company made payments to, or received payments from, Valmont for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of either (i) such other company's consolidated gross revenues or (ii) Valmont's consolidated gross revenues.



•

A director will not be independent if (1) the director or an immediate family member is a current partner of Valmont's independent auditor, (2) the director is an employee of Valmont's independent auditor, (3) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of Valmont's independent auditor who personally works on Valmont's audit, or (4) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or employee of Valmont's independent auditor and personally worked on Valmont's audit within that time.



•

Tax-exempt organizations to which Valmont makes contributions shall not be considered "companies" for purposes of these independence standards. However, Valmont will disclose in its annual proxy statement any such contribution which it makes to a tax-exempt organization in which a director serves as an employed executive officer if, within the preceding three years, contributions in any fiscal year exceeded the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of such tax-exempt organization's consolidated gross revenues.



•

For relationships not covered by the foregoing standards, the determination of whether the relationship is material or not, and therefore whether the director would be independent or not, is made by the directors who satisfy the above independence standards. The board's determination of each director's independence is disclosed annually in the Company's proxy statement.

        The board has determined that all directors except Mr. Bay (the Company's Chief Executive Officer) have no material relationship with the Company and are independent within the meaning of the Company's Corporate Governance Principles and the NYSE listing standards.

Audit Committee

        The members of the Audit Committee are directors Scott (Chairman), den Daas, Neary and Paglia. All members of the Audit Committee are independent within the meaning of the Company's Corporate Governance Principles and the listing standards of the NYSE. The board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are qualified as audit committee financial experts within the meaning of SEC regulations. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter, adopted by the board of directors, a copy of which is available on the Company's website. The report of the Audit Committee is included in this proxy statement.

        The Audit Committee met six times during 2016. The Audit Committee assists the board by reviewing the integrity of the financial statements of the Company; the qualifications, independence

and performance of the Company's independent auditors and internal auditing department; and compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has sole authority to retain, compensate, oversee and terminate the independent auditor. The Audit Committee reviews the Company's annual audited financial statements, quarterly financial statements, and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee reviews reports on various matters, including critical accounting policies of the Company, significant changes in the Company's selection or application of accounting principles, and the Company's internal control processes. The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor. The Audit Committee has a written policy with respect to its review and approval or ratification of transactions between the Company and a director, executive officer or related person. The Audit Committee reviews and approves or disapproves any material related person transaction, i.e., a transaction in which the Company is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a director, executive officer or related person has a direct or indirect material interest. The Audit Committee reports to the board of directors any such material related person transaction that it approves or does not approve.

Human Resources Committee

        The members of the Human Resources Committee are directors Neary (Chairman), Stinson and Paglia. All members of the Human Resources Committee are independent within the meaning of the Company's Corporate Governance Principles and the listing standards of the NYSE. The Human Resources Committee acts under a written charter, adopted by the board of directors, a copy of which is available on the Company's website. The report of the Human Resources Committee is included in this proxy statement.

        The Human Resources Committee met three times during 2016. The Human Resources Committee assists the board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company's directors, executive officers and other selected employees. The Committee has responsibility for reviewing, evaluating and approving compensation plans, policies and programs for such persons. The Human Resources Committee annually reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives for the chief executive officer's compensation and evaluates the chief executive officer's performance in light of those goals and objectives. The Human Resources Committee, together with the other independent directors, determines the chief executive officer's compensation. The Committee also approves incentive compensation plans and equity based plans for executive officers and other selected employees. The Committee reviews the Company's management level organization and programs for management development and succession planning and reviews reports from management on human resources topics as determined by the Committee. The Human Resources Committee has established stock ownership and retention guidelines for company officers, which are described in this proxy statement in Corporate Governance—Governance Actions. The board, upon recommendation of the Human Resources Committee, has established stock ownership guidelines for Company directors, which are described in this proxy statement in Corporate Governance—Governance Actions.

        The Human Resources Committee has the authority to retain the services of independent consultants and other experts to assist in fulfilling its responsibilities. The Committee has engaged the services of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("Cook"), a national executive compensation consulting firm, to review and provide recommendations concerning all of the components of the Company's executive compensation program. Cook performs services solely on behalf of the Committee and does not perform any services for the Company. The Committee has assessed the independence of Cook pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Cook from independently representing the Committee.

Governance and Nominating Committee

        The members of the Governance and Nominating Committee are directors Randt (Chairman), Milliken and Freye. All members of the Governance and Nominating Committee are independent within the meaning of the Company's Corporate Governance Principles and the listing standards of the NYSE. The Governance and Nominating Committee acts under a written charter, adopted by the board of directors, a copy of which is available on the Company's website.

        The Governance and Nominating Committee met four times during 2016. The Governance and Nominating Committee assists the board by (1) recommending to the board Corporate Governance Principles for the Company, and (2) identifying qualified candidates for membership on the board, proposing to the board a slate of directors for election by the shareholders at each annual meeting, and proposing to the board candidates to fill vacancies on the board. The Governance and Nominating Committee coordinates the annual self-evaluation by the directors of the board's performance and the CEO's performance and the annual performance evaluation by each committee of the board. The Governance and Nominating Committee oversees the Company's process for consideration of nominees to the Company's board of directors. The process is described in Director Nomination Process.

Director Nomination Process

        The Governance and Nominating Committee considers candidates for board membership suggested by its members and other board members, as well as management and shareholders. The Committee may also retain a third-party executive search firm to identify candidates from time to time. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a prospective nominee for board membership should notify the Company's Corporate Secretary in writing at least 120 days before the annual shareholder meeting at which directors are to be elected and include whatever support material the shareholder considers appropriate. The Governance and Nominating Committee will also consider nominations by a shareholder pursuant to the provisions of the Company's bylaws relating to shareholder nominations as described in Shareholder Proposals.

        The Governance and Nominating Committee makes an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate once it has identified a prospective nominee. This initial determination is based on whatever information is provided to the Committee as well as other information available to or obtained by the Committee. The preliminary determination is based primarily on the need for additional board members to fill vacancies or expand the size of the board and the likelihood that the prospective nominee can satisfy the evaluation factors described below. If the Committee determines that additional consideration is warranted, it may request a third-party search firm or other third parties to gather additional information about the prospective nominee.

        The Committee evaluates each prospective nominee in light of the standards and qualifications set out in the Company's Corporate Governance Principles, including:

•

Background, including demonstrated high standards of ethics and integrity, the ability to have sufficient time to effectively carry out the duties of a director, and the ability to represent all shareholders and not a particular interest group.



•

Board skill needs, taking into account the experience of current board members, the candidate's ability to work in a collaborative culture with other board members, and the candidate's qualifications as independent and qualifications to serve on the Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee and/or Governance and Nominating Committee.



•

Diversity, including the extent to which the candidate reflects the composition of Company shareholders and other constituencies.

•

Business experience, which should reflect a broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government or education, both domestically and internationally.

        The Committee also considers such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate. In connection with the evaluation, the Committee determines whether to interview the prospective nominee, and if warranted, one or more members of the Committee interview prospective nominees in person or by telephone. After completing this evaluation process, the Committee makes a recommendation to the full board as to the persons who should be nominated by the board, and the board determines the nominees after considering the recommendations of the Committee. The Committee assesses the effectiveness of its policies in determining nominees for director as part of its annual performance evaluation.

ITEM 1:    BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        The Company's board of directors is currently composed of nineeleven members. Following the April stockholder meeting, the board will consist of ten members. The board is divided into three classes and each class serves for three years on a staggered term basis.

        ThreeFive directors have terms of office that expire at the 20172020 annual meeting: Mogens Bay, Walter Scott, Jr., Clark Randt, Jr., Donna Milrod and Clark T. Randt, Jr. These threeRichard Lanoha. Ms. Milrod is not standing for reelection. The remaining four individuals have been nominated by the board of directors, upon recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, for re-election to three-year terms.

        The Company bylaws provide that directors are elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the director at the meeting, unless the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected (a contested election), in which case directors will be elected by the vote of a plurality of the shares present and entitled to vote at the meeting. If a nominee is not elected and the nominee is an incumbent director, the director is required to promptly tender his resignation to the board. The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the tendered resignation and recommend to the board whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken. The board will act on the tendered resignation and publicly disclose its decision within 90 days from the certification of the election results. The director who tenders his resignation will not participate in the Committee's recommendation or the board action regarding whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation.

        The Company's policy on director retirement, as expressed in the Corporate Governance Principles as revised in February 2020, provides that a director will not be nominated to a new term if he or she would be over age 7375 at the time of election. The board evaluated its skill needs and concluded not to apply the policy to Mr. Scott, a highly-experienced director who is Chairman of the Audit Committee, for the 20172020 director election.

        The shares represented by the enclosed proxy will be voted for the election of the nominees named above. In the event any of such nominees becomes unavailable for election, the proxy holders will have discretionary authority to vote the proxies for a substitute. The board of directors has no reason to believe that any such nominee will be unavailable to serve.

        The following discussion provides information about the threefour nominees, and the six directors whose terms expire in 20182021 and 2019,2022, including ages, years of service, business experience, and service on other boards of directors within the past five years. Information is also provided concerning each person's specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the board to conclude that the person should serve as a director of the Company.

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION—Terms Expire 20202023

        Mogens C. Bay, age 68,71, has been non-executive Chairman of the Company since January 2019. He served as Executive Chairman of the Company during 2018. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company sincefrom January 1997. He was1997 through December 2017, and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from August 1993 through December 1996. Mr. Bay currently servespreviously served as a director of Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc. and previously served as a director of ConAgra Foods, Inc. Mr. Bay is the only Valmont officer who serves on the Company's board of directors. Mr. Bay's 3840 years of experience with Valmont provides an extensive knowledge of Valmont's operating companies and its lines of business, its long-term strategies and domestic and international growth opportunities. Mr. Bay has served as a director of the Company since October 1993.

        Walter Scott, Jr., age 85,88, previously served as Chairman of the Board and President of Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc. Mr. Scott was Chairman of Level 3 Communications from 1998 - 2014.1998-2014. Mr. Scott is a director of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Energy. He previously served as a director of Commonwealth Telephone Enterprises and Burlington Resources. Mr. Scott is a civil

engineer with management experience of infrastructure construction operations at Kiewit. His extensive board experience provides a valuable resource of strategic and oversight input to the Valmont board of directors. He has served as a director of the Company since April 1981.

        Clark T. Randt, JrJr.., age 71,74, is currently President of Randt & Co. LLC (business consulting) and lived and worked in Asia for more than thirty-five years. Ambassador Randt served as the United States Ambassador to the People's Republic of China from July 2001 to January 2009. He currently serves as a director of United Parcel Service, Inc., Qualcomm Incorporated and Wynn Resorts Ltd. Ambassador Randt was formerly a partner with the international law firm of Shearman & Sterling in Hong Kong where he headed the firm's China practice. Ambassador Randt is a member of the New York bar association and was admitted to the Hong Kong bar association and has over 25 years of experience in cross-border corporate and finance transactions. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. His international experience and knowledge of Asian business operations and experience with U.S. investment in China serves the Company well as it expands its operations in Asia. Ambassador Randt has served as a director of the Company since February 2009.

        Richard A. Lanoha, age 52, has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Peter Kiewit Sons' Inc. and Kiewit Corporation since January 2020. President and Chief Operating Officer of Kiewit 2016-2019. He was President of Kiewit Energy Group 2012-2016 and Executive Vice President of Kiewit Industrial Group responsible for Kiewit Energy and Kiewit Power divisions of Kiewit 2010-2012. Mr. Lanoha has management experience of infrastructure construction operations at Kiewit and his experience provides a valuable resource of strategic and oversight input to the Valmont board of directors. He has served as a director of the Company since October 2019.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" EACH OF THE ABOVE NOMINEES.

CONTINUING DIRECTORS—Terms Expire in 20192021

Daniel P. Neary, age 68, is a member of the board of directors of Mutual of Omaha (full service and multi-line provider of insurance and financial services). Mr. Neary served as CEO of Mutual from 2004-2015 and as Chairman until January 2018. Mutual of Omaha's revenues were in excess of $7 billion in 2019. He was previously President of the Group Insurance business unit of Mutual of Omaha. Mr. Neary's training as an actuary and knowledge of the financial services industry provides valuable background for board oversight of the Company's accounting matters. His experience in strategic development and risk assessment for the Mutual of Omaha insurance companies are well suited to membership on Valmont's board of directors. Mr. Neary has been a director of the Company since December 2005.

Theo Freye, age 70, retired in October 2014 as CEO of CLAAS KgaA, a $4.5 billion family owned agricultural machinery firm headquartered in Germany. Mr. Freye, a native of Germany, has more than 30 years of international machinery experience. He holds a Master's Degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Agricultural Science. His extensive international business experience and engineering background provides value to the Valmont board of directors. Mr. Freye has served as a director of the Company since June 2015.

Stephen G. Kaniewski, age 48, has been Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 2018. He was President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from October 2016 through December 2017. Prior to that he was Group President of Valmont's Utility Support Structures Segment. Mr. Kaniewski joined Valmont in 2010 as Vice President, Information Technology and also has held the position of Vice President, Global Operations for the Irrigation Segment. Mr. Kaniewski's duties in various Company operating positions provides valuable knowledge and experience of the Company's operations and strategies. Mr. Kaniewski has served as a director of the Company since January 2018.

CONTINUING DIRECTORS—Terms Expire in 2022

        Kaj den Daas, age 67,70, was CEO of Quality Light Source until March 2018. He transitioned into a non-executive position in the holding company QL Light Source Company Ltd. (manufacturer and marketer of LED lamps) in April 2018. He was CEO of Quality Light Source, LLC from October 2017 to March 2018; CEO of TCP International Holdings, Ltd. (lighting products manufacturer) from July 2015 to October 2016. Mr. den Daas retired in 2009 as Executive Vice President of Philips Lighting B.V. of the Netherlands (manufacturer of lighting fixtures and related components) and Chairman of its North American Lighting Operations. Mr. den Daas was responsible for oversight of the manufacturing, distribution, sales and marketing of Philips products in the United States, Canada and Mexico, with prior Philips experience in the Asia Pacific area. He previously served on the board of directors of Lighting Science Group Corp. Mr. den Daas, a native of the Netherlands, has more than 35 years of international experience in the lighting industry. His extensive international business experience provides value to the Valmont board of directors. Mr. den Daas has been a director of the Company since October 2004.

        James B. Milliken, age 60,63, is Chancellor of the University of Texas System which enrolls over 235,000 students and has beenan annual budget of over $20 billion. He was Chancellor of the City University of New York sincefrom June 2014. CUNY is the nation's largest urban public university with 275,000 students pursuing degrees on 24 campuses in New York City and another 250,000 adult and continuing education students. CUNY has an annual operating budget of over $4 billion.2014 to May 2018. Mr. Milliken was President of the University of Nebraska from August 2004 to May 2014; the University of Nebraska has an annual budget of approximately $2.5 billion.2014. Mr. Milliken has a law degree from New York University and practiced law on Wall Street before his academic career. He has led the development of research and education

programs in China, India, Brazil and other countries. He is a member of the Council on FederalForeign Relations and the Executive Committee on the Council on Competitiveness. He has chaired commissions on innovation and economic competitiveness for the Association of Public and Land-grant universities and the Council on Competitiveness. Mr. Milliken's experience in managing large organizations which work closely with business and industry and in countries around the world provides value to the Valmont board of directors as the Company grows internationally. Mr. Milliken has served as a director of the Company since December 2011.

        Catherine James Paglia, age 64,67, has been a director of Enterprise Asset Management, Inc., a New York based privately-held real estate and asset management company since September 1998. Ms. Paglia previously spent eight years as a managing director at Morgan Stanley, ten years as a managing director of Interlaken Capital, and served as chief financial officer of two public corporations. Ms. Paglia serves on the board of directors of the Columbia Funds and is a member of the board of trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Her extensive Wall Street experience and prior service as a chief financial officer of public companies provide an excellent background for membership on Valmont's Audit Committee. Ms. Paglia has served as a director of the Company since February 2012.

CONTINUING DIRECTORS—Terms Expire 2018
Board Committees

        Daniel P. Neary, age 65,The Board has been Chairman of Mutual of Omaha (full servicethe following standing committees: Audit, Human Resources, and multi-line provider of insuranceGovernance and financial services) since December 2004. Mr. Neary served as CEO of Mutual from 2004 - 2015. Mutual of Omaha's revenues were in excess of $7 billion in 2016. He was previously PresidentNominating.

Audit Committee

        The members of the Group Insurance business unitAudit Committee during 2019 were directors Scott (Chairman), den Daas, Neary, Paglia and Milrod. All members of Mutualthe Audit Committee are independent within the meaning of Omaha. Mr. Neary's trainingthe Company's Corporate Governance Principles and the listing standards of the NYSE. The board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are qualified as an actuary and knowledgeaudit committee financial experts within the meaning of SEC regulations. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter, adopted by the board of directors, a copy of which is available on the Company's website. The report of the Audit Committee is included in this proxy statement.

        The Audit Committee met six times during 2019. The Audit Committee assists the board by reviewing the integrity of the financial services industry provides valuable background for board oversightstatements of the Company; the qualifications, independence

        The board has determined that all directors except Mr. Kaniewski (the Company's Chief Executive Officer) and Mr. Bay (the Company's Chief Executive Officer through December 2017) have no material relationship with the Company and are independent within the meaning of the Company since December 2005.

Kenneth E. Stinson, age 74, is currently Chairman Emeritus of Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc. (constructionCompany's Corporate Governance Principles and mining). Mr. Stinson was Chairmanthe NYSE listing standards. The Directors determined that

        The Committee also considers such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate. In connection with the construction of highways, bridges, transit systems, power plantsevaluation, the Committee determines whether to interview the prospective nominee, and refineries for commercial, industrial and governmental customers. His extensive experience in the United States infrastructure business aids the board's oversight of Valmont's engineered support structures segment and utility support structures segment. Mr. Stinson has served as a directorif warranted, one or more members of the Company since December 1996.

Theo Freye, age 67, retiredCommittee interview prospective nominees in October 2014 as CEO of CLAAS KgaA,person or by telephone. After completing this evaluation process, the Committee makes a $4.5 billion family owned agricultural machinery firm headquartered in Germany. Mr. Freye, a native of Germany, has more than 30 years of international machinery experience. He holds a Master's Degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Agricultural Science. His extensive international business experience and engineering background provides valuerecommendation to the Valmontfull board of directors. Mr. Freye has served as a directorto the persons who should be nominated by the board, and the board determines the nominees after considering the recommendations of the Company since June 2015.Committee. The Committee assesses the effectiveness of its policies in determining nominees for director as part of its annual performance evaluation.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

        General.    The following compensation discussion and analysis provides information which the Human Resources Committee of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors (the "Committee")Committee) believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of Valmont's executive compensation programs. This discussion should be read in conjunction with these sections of the proxy statement: (1) the summary compensation table

and related tables, (2) the Human Resources Committee information in the corporate governance section and (3) the compensation summary in the advisory vote on executive compensation section.

        Say-On-Pay Vote.    Valmont conducted its first advisory vote on executive compensation in April 2011. Valmont's shareholders in April 2011 cast 94.6% of their votes in favor of an annual say-on-pay vote. The compensation resolution passed with at least 96% of the vote in each year, including 98.6% in 2016.2019. Valmont's shareholders in April 2017 cast 86.2% of their votes in favor of an annual frequency say-on-pay vote. The board of directors and the Human Resources Committee considered these results in determining compensation policies and decisions, and determined to hold annual say-on-pay votes and, based on the significant level of shareholder support, to continue the current compensation objectives, strategies, processes and practices described below.

        Compensation Objectives and Strategies.    Valmont's executive compensation programs, policies and practices are approved by the Committee. The compensation programs apply to executive officers and to certain key employees who are not executive officers. The programs specifically apply to the executive officers listed in the summary compensation table (named executive officers). The Committee has established Valmont compensation objectives pursuant to which Valmont's compensation programs are designed to:

•

provide target total compensation amountslevels at competitive market levelsrates to attract, retain, motivate and reward the performance of executive officers and other key employees;



•

direct management focus to the long-term growth of the Company, enhance shareholder value, and ensure that executive officers have significant ownership without increasing dilution over acceptable levels; and



•

pay for performance by providing performance basedperformance-based incentive plans measured against establishedpre-established targets, with no guaranteed minimum payment provisions, and with total awardsactual payments above median market levels for exceeding performance targets and below median market levels if performance targets are not achieved.

The Committee established compensation strategies designed to carry out the compensation objectives, including:

•

target total compensation evaluated by position, on an annual basis, against like positions in companies of similar sales volume, according to data provided by outsidethe Committee's independent compensation consultants; and



•

base pay, annual incentives and long-term incentives targeted at median market levels, with the opportunity for annual and long-term incentives at the 75th percentile or higher for significantly exceeding performance targets. Actual compensation will be above median if performance exceeds targets and below median when performance is below targets.

The Committee has engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("Cook")(FW Cook) as the Committee's independent executive compensation consultant. FW Cook reports directly to the Committee and provides advice to the Committee on the structure and amounts of executive and non-employee director compensation. FW Cook provides no other services to the Company.

        Compensation Processes and Practices.    The Committee follows certain processes and practices in connection with the structure and implementation of executive compensation plans.

•

The elements of compensation, and target total compensation are reviewed annually against general industry survey data and a peer group developed by FW Cook and approved by the Committee. The Committee uses the survey data and peer group information to assess the competitiveness of target compensation levels and pay mix for the CEO, CFO and other executives.

•

The Committee used as its primary benchmark a general industry Aon Hewitt Survey of 107approximately 134 companies which FW Cook adjusted to provide representativemarket compensation levels for companies within a range of Valmont's annual revenues. The adjusted revenue size range of the companies in the Aon Hewitt Survey was approximately $2.53$2.80 billion. Valmont's 20162019 revenues were approximately $2.52$2.77 billion. The competitive medians referenced below for base salary, target annual incentives and long-term incentives are the competitive medians based on the Aon Hewitt Survey data.



•

The Committee also used a peer group developed by FW Cook as a supplemental benchmark of CEO and CFO pay levels. FW Cook advised that, due to differences in the jobs of the individuals reported in the proxies of the peer group companies, consistent and reliable comparable compensation information was available only for the CEO and CFO. The current peer group consistsfor 2019 compensation consisted of the following twelve companies:

•

The Company's revenues approximated the median of the peer group. The peer group had median revenue of $2.58$2.81 billion. Valmont's revenues for 20162019 were approximately $2.52$2.77 billion.



•

The Committee in October 2019 reviewed the Company's peer group and recommendations from FW Cook. The Committee determined to increase the number of peers to ensure robust and stable compensation data and to diversify the industries included in the peer group to account for the evolution of Valmont's business portfolio and strategy. The committee approved the following new peer group of nineteen companies for compensation decisions beginning in December 2019:

•

The Company's revenues approximate the median of the new peer group. The new peer group had median revenue of $2.94 billion. Valmont's revenues for 2019 were approximately $2.77 billion.



•

The Committee also reviews a tally sheet with respect to the total compensation (target and actual) of each named executive officer and each group president. The Committee utilizes tally sheets as a reference point to ensure that the Committee has a comprehensive picture of the compensation paid and payable to each executive officer. The Committee uses market data provided by its independent compensation consultantFW Cook as one of the primary factors in executive compensation decisions and the tally sheets are not determinative with respect to any particular element of compensation.



•

The compensation programs provide for both cash and equity elements. Base salary and annual incentives are paid in cash. Long-term incentives paid for the 2017-2019 plan comprised of

Company performance shares are paid in cash for executives who have met their stock ownership guidelines, and are paid 50% in cash and 50% in equity for other executives.executives; beginning with payouts for the 2018-2020 long-term incentive plan, payouts will be settled in equity. Stock options are settled in equity.



•

The Committee determines the mix of cash and equity compensation. The Committee has no pre-established policy for the allocation between either cash and non-cashequity or short-term and long-term incentive compensation. The Committee reviews information provided by compensation consultantsFW Cook to determine the appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation. The Committee believes that a majority of an executive's overall compensation opportunity should be incentive-based and that each executive who has not attained applicable stock ownership guidelines should receive at least 50% of long-term performance plan compensation in equity.incentive-based.



•

The structure of all incentive compensation plans is reviewed periodically to assure their linkage to the current objectives and strategies and performance goals.



•

The Committee's policy is to establish base salary, target annual incentives and long-term incentives with targets at or near the competitive median level and potential payouts of incentives up to 200% of target for executive officers who significantly exceed performance targets. The annual incentives and long-term incentives are established for each executive officer by using a percentage of base salary that approximates the competitive target median for the executive. There are no material differences in compensation policies with respect to individual executive officers.

•

The Company's programs have been designed so that compensation paid to executive officers will generally be deductible under the Internal Revenue Code's compensation limits for deductibility, although the Committee may from time to time make restricted stock awards or discretionary cash awards in excess of the deductibility limits to recognize exceptional performance in a particular year.deductibility. Executive compensation generally produces ordinary income to the executive and a corresponding tax deduction for Valmont, except for amounts deferred under Valmont's qualified and related nonqualified plan,plans, amounts subject to future vesting, and amounts related to stock awards which are subject to special accounting and tax provisions. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally places a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation a company can deduct in any one year for certain executive officers. Previous law provided an exemption from the limitation for performance-based compensation. This exemption has been repealed for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. Consequently, compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1 million may not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017.

        Elements of Compensation.    Valmont's executive compensation is based on three components, each of which is intended to support the overall compensation philosophy.

•

The three components are base salary, annual incentives, and long-term performance incentives (which include equity incentives). For 2016,2019, base salary accounted for approximately 70.5%27.9% of the total compensation of the named executive officers and incentive compensation accounted for approximately 25.7%68.0% of such total compensation.



•

Valmont's executive officers do not have employment agreements.



•

Valmont's executive officers do not have agreements providing for special payments in the event of a termination of employment or a change-of-control of Valmont. Valmont's 20132018 Stock Plan provides for accelerated vesting of non-vested amounts in the event of an involuntary termination following a change-of-control. See Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.



•

Valmont does not have a pension plan. Valmont's executive officers do participate in its 401(k) Plan and also participate in the related non-qualified supplemental benefit plan.

•

Valmont does not maintain a perquisite program for its executive officers. Amounts relating to the Chief Executive Officer's limited use of Company aircraft for personal travel are included in the summary compensation table.



•

Valmont has an executive compensation recoupment policy covering cash and equity described on page 5.10.



•

Valmont has policies prohibiting hedging and pledging of Company stock by directors and officers.

2019 Compensation Program Elements.

        Base Salary.    Base salary is targeted at the competitive median level. Competitive median levels are provided by FW Cook based on the primary benchmark survey prepared by Aon Hewitt.Aon. Base salary is intended to compensate the executive for satisfying the requirements of the position. Salaries for executive officers and other key employees are reviewed by the Committee on an annual basis and may be changed based on the individual's performance or a change in competitive pay levels in the marketplace.

        The Committee reviews with the Chief Executive Officer an annual salary plan for the Company's executive officers and other key employees (other than the Chief Executive Officer). The annual salary plan is developed by the Company's Human Resources staff, under the ultimate direction of the Chief Executive Officer, and is based on national surveys of companies with similar characteristics and on performance judgments as to the past and expected future contributions of the individual executive. The salary plan is modified as deemed appropriate and approved by the Committee. The Committee reviews and establishes the base salary of the Chief Executive Officer based on competitive compensation data provided by FW Cook using data for similar sized companies and the Committee's assessment of his past performance, his leadership in establishing performance standards in the conduct of the Company's business, and its expectation as to his future contribution in directing the long-term success of the Company and its businesses.

        The Committee continued the Company's combined matching contribution under the Valmont Employees Retirement Savings Plan (a 401(k) plan) and related Restoration Plan (a non-qualified plan in place since 2002 designed to restore benefits otherwise limited by IRS regulations). The contribution is 15% of covered compensation (salary, bonus and cash incentives) for Mr. Bay and 4.5% for other executive officers. The Committee set the contribution percentage for the Chief Executive Officer at a higher rate due to the need to retain his critical services and the absence of any pension plan; the higher contribution percentage for the Chief Executive Officer will end when Mr. Bay no longer holds this position. The Company's contributions to such plans for 20162019 compensation (4.5% of covered compensation) for the named executive officers (which matched the amounts contributed by such executive officers) are set forth in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table.

        Based on the factors described above, the Committee in December 20152018 reviewed the base salaries of the named executive officers for 2016. The base salary for Mr. Bay was not changed. The base salaries for the other named executive officers were increased 3%, except2019. Mr. Kaniewski's base salary was increased 5.5% to $950,000, Mr. Jaksich's 3% to $562,264 and Mr. Francis' 5% to $337,613. Mr. Parnell's base salary of $340,000 and Mr. Laterreur's base salary of $375,000 were established at $575,000 when he became Chief Operating Officerbased on FW Cook data as of their respective promotion or hire dates in October 2016. . For 2016, base salaries of Bay, Jaksich, and2019.

        The target direct compensation (base salary plus target annual incentive plus target long-term incentive) for Mr. Kaniewski were 104%, 106%, and 107%was 85% of the survey competitive median level.and for Mr. Jaksich was 98% of the survey competitive median.

        The Committee reviewed executive base salaries for 2020 in December 2016 again2019 based on the factors described above. The Committee made no change in the base salary for 2017 of Mr. Bay or Mr. Kaniewski.      The base salaries for 2017 for the other named executive officersMessrs. Kaniewski, Francis and Laterreur were increased 3%., Mr. Parnell's base salary was increased 4%, and Mr. Jaksich's base salary was unchanged.

        Annual Incentives.    The Company's short-term incentives are paid pursuant to programsfor 2019 were established underby the shareholder approved Executive Incentive Plan.Committee. The Committee believesdetermined for 2019 that the annual incentive of executive officersexecutives should be based on optimizing profits and managing working capital.revenue growth. Accordingly, the executive officer programs provide

for target performance levels based 75% on the Company's net earnings performance and 25% on working capital intensity. Working capital intensity is average working capital (average accounts receivable, average FIFO inventory and average prepaid expenses less average accounts payable and average accrued expenses) divided by annual net sales.revenue growth performance. Annual incentives are targeted at the competitive median level. Competitive median levels are provided by FW Cook based on the primary benchmark survey prepared by Aon Hewitt.Aon. For 2016,2019, each named executive officer's annual incentive opportunity ranged from 0% to 200% of the targeted incentive, depending on the level of achievement of the Company's performance goals. For executive officers' 20162019 annual incentives, a target incentive was established ranging from 40%45% to 110%100% of base salary, and performance goals were set based on net earnings and working capital intensity performance; the percentagerevenue growth results.

2019 Target Incentives—Percentage of base salary for the named executive officers was: Mr. Bay, 110%; Mr. Jaksich, 70%; Mr. Kaniewski, 60%, Mr. Ruffalo, 60%; and Ms. Brown, 40%. The annual incentive targets for Bay, Jaksich, and Kaniewski were 108%, 72%, and 80% of the survey competitive median level.Base Salary

        A minimum threshold level of performance had to be attained before any incentive was earned by an executive officer. Payout under the plan to any executive officer was capped at two times the target incentive. Participants, thresholds and specific performance levels are established by the Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year. The Committee may in additionalso award discretionary non-incentive basednon-incentive-based bonuses to an executive officer to recognize exceptional performance in a particular year; noyear. No discretionary awards were made to named executive officers with respect to performance in the last three years.

        The Committee approved in February 20162019 participation, including executive officers, in the short-term incentive program for 2016.2019. The annual incentives for 20162019 were based 75% on net earnings improvement and 25% on net working capital intensity. With respectrevenue growth. Each performance measure operates independently. The Committee established the measures below to be used for the incentive threshold (payout at 50% of target), target incentive (payout at target), and maximum incentive (payout at 2x target) for both 2019 net earnings improvement the Human Resources Committee establishedand 2019 revenue growth. Payouts are linearly interpolated for performance between threshold/target and target/maximum performance levels.

Net Earnings Improvement (75% Weight)

Revenue Growth (25% Weight)

        The threshold, target and maximum amounts for revenue growth represent total revenue numbers. The 2019 net earnings (GAAP net earnings of $140$153.76 million a 6% improvement over 2015 net earnings of $132increased by $2.52 million (which adjusted net earnings added back certain impairment, restructuring and non-recurring charges); the Human Resources Committee determined that a target annual incentive would be earned for net earnings of $155 million (a 17% increase) and that a

maximum incentive of 2x target would be earned for net earnings of $190 million (a 44% increase). With respect to net working capital intensity, the Human Resources Committee established a threshold of 21.5%, a target of 20.3% and a maximum incentive of 2x target for a net working capital intensity of 19%. The 2016 net working capital intensity of 21.3%Coatings segment non-recurring legal expense) were $156.3 million, which resulted in an incentiveperformance at 59%50.7% of target. The 2016 net earnings of $145.82019 revenue was $2,767 million, ($173.2 million GAAP earnings reduced primarily by a contingent liability reversal and non-recurring income tax benefits) resultedresulting in earnings performance at 69%78.5% of target. The combination of the two factors resulted in an annual incentive payout for executive officers at 67%57.7% of target for 2016. Mr. Kaniewski's 2016 annual incentive was based on the performance of the Global Utility business which he headed prior to becoming Chief Operating Officer in October 2016; the performance factors were based 75% on division earnings and 25% on division working capital intensity. Mr. Ruffalo's 2016 annual incentive was based in part on the performance of the Energy and Minings business which he headed; the performance factors were based 80% on division earnings and 20% on division working capital intensity.2019. Based on the 20162019 results, annual incentivesincentive payouts for 20162019 were $722,260as follows:

2019 Annual Incentives

        The Committee also established an additional incentive potential payout of 20% (all or nothing) of base salary based on individual performance goals established by the Committee, for a group including executive officers, but in no event could the total annual incentive payout exceed the 2x cap. The Committee approved payouts based on pre-established goals of $68,000 to Mr. Bay, $241,325 forParnell and $43,725 (prorated based on hire date) to Mr. Jaksich, $192,635 for Mr. Kaniewski, $225,262 for Mr. Ruffalo, and $94,200 for Ms. Brown.Laterreur.

        In February 2017,2020, the Committee selected the participants and established the performance goals for the 20172020 annual incentive program; theprogram. The performance goals for named executive officers in 20172020 are again based 75% on net earnings and 25% on net working capital intensity.revenue growth. The additional incentive potential payout plan referenced in the preceding paragraph was not continued in 2020.

        Long-Term Performance Incentives.    Long-term performance incentives for senior management employees arein 2019 were provided in two ways: through the long-term performance share programs established under the shareholder approved Executive Incentive Plan,program, and through equity awards under the shareholder approved 20132018 Stock Plan. Both long-term performance incentive programs (long-term performance share plan and equity awards) are targeted at competitive median levels. Competitive median levels are provided by FW Cook based on the primary benchmark survey prepared by Aon Hewitt.Aon. For the three-year award cycle ended in 2016,2019, each named executive officer's long-term incentive opportunity under the performance share program ranged from 0% to 200% of the targeted incentive, depending on the level of achievement of the Company's performance goals. The 2016 long-term incentive targets (for both performance shares and options) for Bay, Jaksich and Kaniewski were 107%, 97% and 113% of the survey competitive median level.

        The current long-term performance share programs operate on three-year award cycles. The Committee selects participants, establishes target awards, and determines a performance matrix. The Committee in February 20142017 designed the matrix for the award cycle ending in 20162019 to encourage both the effective use of the Company's capital and the growth of its earnings, and consequently the matrix was based on average return on invested capital or "ROIC" and cumulative compound operating income growth or "OIG", weighted 40%50% ROIC and 60%50% OIG, at the beginning of the award cycle. AverageThe Committee established the following performance measures for ROIC of less than 8.0% coupled withand OIG growth of less than 3% resultedfor the award cycle ending in no incentive payment. Average ROIC of 9.5% coupled with OIG growth of 10% generated a target incentive payment (based on2019:

        The Committee in February 2017 selected the competitive median established by Cook's primary benchmark survey). Average ROIC of 13% coupled with OIG of 17% generated a two times target incentive payment (based onparticipants, including executive officers, for participation in the Committee's judgment as to performance substantially exceeding the target levels).three-year award cycle ending in 2019. Targets for the 2014-20162017-2019 award cycle were

established based on a predetermined percentage ranging from 20%40% to 175%150% of base salary, which amount was converted to performance shares valued at the Company's stock price at the beginning of the performance period (which for the 2014-20162017-2019 performance period was a thirty-day average of $144.48)$148.57). The percentagespercentage of base salary for the named executive officers was:

        Mr. Bay, 175%; Mr. Jaksich 70% for periods as CFO and 40% for prior periods; Ms. Brown, 40% and Mr. Kaniewski, 60% for the 2014-2016 plan andKaniewski's percentage of base salary was 85% for periods as Chief Operating Officer and 70% for prior periods for the plans ending in 2017 and 2018.150% for 2018 and 2019 (after he became CEO). Mr. Ruffalo who was hired in 2015 received a prorated participationLaterreur did not participate in the plan.2017-2019 plan due to his May 2019 hire date.

        The performance matrix provides for the potential payouts to be increased or decreased in number based on greater or lesser levels of performance. Earned performance shares are valued at the Company's stock price at the end of the performance

period (the thirty-day average prior to fiscal year end); consequently, payouts may be higher or lower based on the Company's stock price performance during the award cycle. Performance incentives are generally forfeited if a participant leaves the Company before the end of the performance cycle. Prorated awards may be earned based on performance results in the event of death, disability, normal retirement, termination of employment without cause, or a change in control. Earned performance shares are capped at two times the target number of performance shares. The Committee approves the number of performance shares to be paid following a review of results at the end of each performance cycle. Awards may be paid in cash or in shares of common stock or any combination of cash and stock; participants who have not attained applicable stock ownership guidelines receive 50% of the award in common stock.

        The Committee in February 2014 selected the participants, including executive officers, for participation in the three-year award cycle ending in 2016. Based on the above described ROIC and OIG performance goals established by the Committee, and the Company's three-year average 9.9% ROIC on an adjusted basis was 10.22% and negativethe three-year cumulative compound adjusted operating income growth nowas 1.00%, resulting in an earnout at 65.8% of target. The Company's calculation of return on invested capital for the three fiscal years is on page 20 of the 2019 Form 10-K. The 2018 ROIC used an adjusted operating income and an adjusted tax expense. The 2018 adjusted operating income (GAAP operating income of $202.3 million increased by net aggregate pre-tax adjustments of $67.1 million of non-recurring items relating to restructuring expense of $34.0 million, goodwill and intangible asset impairments of $15.8 million, inventory and other assets impairments for plant closures of $7.9 million, non-recurring vendor quality expenses of $5.0 million and acquisition diligence costs of $4.4 million) was $269.4 million on an adjusted basis. Using an adjusted tax rate of 24.0% (adjusted to exclude the non-deductible goodwill impairment and certain restructuring expenses in taxing jurisdictions where the Company will not realize a tax benefit) resulted in an adjusted after-tax operating income of $204.7 million. The 2019 ROIC used an adjusted operating income. The 2019 adjusted operating income (GAAP operating income of $237.7 million plus $5.8 million of pre-tax expense from the nonqualified deferred compensation plan plus $3.3 million of pre-tax non-recurring legal expense) was $246.8 million.

        The Company's stock price during the performance sharesperiod decreased from $148.57 to $144.78 which decreased the value of the earned performance shares. Consequently, long-term payments were earned by the named executive officers as follows:

2017-2019 Long-Term Incentives

        All awards to the named executive officers were paid in cash, except 50% of the awards to Mr. Kaniewski and Mr. Parnell were paid in stock. There were no payments made for 2016 or 2017 under the 2014-2016 period.and 2015-2017 long-term incentive plans. Payments under the 2016-2018 long-term incentive plan were 114.3% of target.

        In February 2016,2019, the Committee selected the participants and established the performance goals for the 2016-20182019-2021 award cycle; the performance goals for the cycle ending in 20182021 are again based on a combination of growth in operating income and return on invested capital; beginning with the 2015-2017 award cycle, the Committee changed the weighting to 50% average ROIC and 50% OIG growth to reflect an increased emphasis on improving operations and working capital management.

capital. Targets were established for executive officers based on a percentage of base salary ranging from 40% to 175%165% and performance targets established at 9.5%10% average ROIC and 10% OIG growth. In February 2017, the Committee selected the participants and established the performance goals for the 2017-2019 long-term performance share program; the performance goals for named executive officers are again based on ROIC and OIG performance with a weighting 50% ROIC and 50% OIG.

        Stock Incentives and Ownership Guidelines.    The board of directors, upon recommendation of the Committee, has established stock ownership and retention guidelines for senior management. The guidelines require an equity position having a value of six6.0 times base salary for the Chief Executive Officer, three2.5 times base salary for the Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer and Group Presidents, 1.5 times base salary for senior vice presidents and two1.0 times base salary for other corporate officers. The officers are required to retain 75%50% of the net shares acquired upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock until the stock ownership guidelines have been attained and maintained. The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the other named executive officers currently meet these targets, except for Mr. RuffaloKaniewski who was hiredbecame a named executive officer in March 2015 andOctober 2016, Mr. KaniewskiParnell who became an executive officer in October 2016. The Company has policies prohibiting hedgingJanuary 2019, and pledging of Company stock by directors and officers.Mr. Laterreur who became a named executive officer in May 2019.

        Long-term stock incentives are provided through grants of stock options and restricted stock units to executive officers and other key employees pursuant to the shareholder approved 20132018 Stock Plan. The stock component of compensation is intended to retain and motivate employees to improve long-term shareholder value. Such grants for executive officers were in 2014, 20152017, 2018 and 20162019 made at the regularly scheduled Committee meeting in December of each year as part of the compensation for the upcoming year. Stock options are granted at the market value on the date of grant and have value only if the Company's stock price increases. Stock options granted during 20162019 vest beginning on the first anniversary of the grant in equal amounts over three years and expire seven years after the date of grant. Employees must be employed by the Company at the time of vesting in order to exercise the options. Options granted in 20162019 also vest on death, disability and involuntary termination following a change-of-control; ifchange-of-control. If an employee retires after age 62 (with five years of service), options continue to vest and be exercisable according to the original terms. The Company's stock plans prohibit repricing. Restricted stock units granted during 20162019 vest in

three equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant; the units also vest on death, disability and involuntary termination following a change-of-control, and vesting is prorated if an employee retires after age 62 (with five years of service).

        The Committee establishes the number and terms of the options and restricted stock units granted under the stock plans. The Committee established the terms and provisions of such equity grants based

on industry standards as provided to the Committee by its independent compensation consultant. The Committee established the number of options and restricted stock units to each executive officer so that the aggregate long-term incentive compensation would be targeted at competitive median levels. The value used in determining the number of stock options granted to each executive officer was computed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, which is described in footnote 1112 to the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Committee encourages executives to build a substantial ownership investment in the Company's common stock. The table on page 3 reflects the ownership position of the directors and executive officers at March 1, 2017.6, 2020. Outstanding performance by an individual executive officer is recognized through larger equity grants. The Committee, in determining grants of equity under the stock plans, also reviews and considers the executive's history of retaining shares previously obtained through the exercise of prior options and restricted stock grants. In December 2016,2019, stock options and/or restricted stock units were granted to named executive officers with a fair market value of a percentage of base salary: Mr. Bay, 175%; Mr. Jaksich, 80%; Mr. Kaniewski, 85%; Mr. Ruffalo, 70%; and Ms. Brown, 50%.salary as follows:

        The amounts were established so that aggregate long-term incentive compensation would be targeted at competitive median levels. Competitive median levels are provided by FW Cook based on the primary benchmark survey prepared by Aon Hewitt.Aon.

        The Committee granted options for an aggregate of 83,54057,648 shares to 11 employees and restricted stock units for an aggregate of 51,00269,553 shares to 250a total of 241 employees in December 2016,2019, including options and restricted stock units to named executive officers as described below. The Committee had granted options in 2016 for 1,522 shares and restricted stock units for 7,9328,765 shares, including restricted stock units for director fees, prior to December 2016.2019.

        The Committee determined in December 2016 that the annual equity grants to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer should be stock options, and the equity grants to the other executive officers should be 50% stock options and 50% restricted stock units (on a value basis), to reflect current market practices as determined by FW Cook. In December 2016,2019, the Committee granted 42,377the following stock options to Mr. Bay, and 12,076 stock options to Mr. Kaniewski. The Committee also granted 5,238 stock options and 1,395 restricted stock units to the named executive officers:

December 2019 Stock Grants

Mr. Jaksich, 4,129 stock options and 1,100Laterreur also received a grant of 89 restricted stock units to Mr. Ruffalo, and 2,236 stock options and 595 restricted stock units to Ms. Brown.upon his hire in May 2019. The option grants and restricted stock unit grants vest in equal installments over three years. The Committee determined that such grants were appropriate long-term incentives, based on market data and the Committee's review of each executive's performance.

        The Committee believes that the programs described above provide compensation that is competitive with comparable companies, link executive and shareholder interests and provide the basis

for the Company to attract and retain qualified executives. The Committee will continue to monitor the relationship among executive compensation, the Company's performance, and shareholder value.

Chief Operating Officer DesignationHedging and Pledging Policy

        Valmont's policy prohibiting directors and officers from hedging or pledging Company stock has been in effect for more than ten years. The board ofCompany reviewed and enhanced its policy in December 2019. The current policy prohibits hedging and pledging transactions by directors, named Stephen Kaniewski as Presidentexecutive officers, corporate officers and Chief Operating Officer effective October 1, 2016. Mr. Kaniewski joinedgroup presidents with respect to any Valmont in 2010 as Vice President—Information Technology, became Vice President—Global Operations for the Irrigation segment in 2014, and became Group President of the Utility Support Structures segment in 2015. The Human Resources Committee approved Mr. Kaniewski's compensation effective October 2016 as follows: (1) a base salary of $575,000 per year, (2) continued participation in Valmont's 2016 Global Utility Annual Incentive Plan,

(3) continued participationequity securities held directly or indirectly by such persons. Hedges are any transactions designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the performance share element of Valmont's 2014-2016, 2015-2017, and 2016-2018 Long Term Incentive Plans with a target of (i) 60% of prior base salary for the 2014-2016 Plan and (ii) 80% of base salary from start date as Chief Operating Officer (and 70% of base salary for prior periods) for the 2015-2017 Plan and the 2016-2018 Plan, capped at 2x target, (4) continued participation in the stock option element of Valmont's Long-Term Incentive Plans, with an eligibility for an option grant in December 2016 with a targetmarket value of 85% of base salary,Valmont equity securities. Such transactions include short-sales, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and (5) participation in Valmont's Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, VERSP 401(k) Plan, and health and welfare benefit plans.exchanges.

Compensation Risk Assessment

        The Human Resources Committee in February 2017, with its independent compensation consultant,2020 conducted a risk assessment of the Company's compensation programs.programs which was reviewed by its independent compensation consultant. The Committee determined that the risks arising from the Company's compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Committee believes the programs are designed to promote long-term value creation and do not motivate imprudent risk taking. The Company sets performance goals that are reasonable in light of past performance and market conditions. The annual and long-term incentive plans for executives and senior management use an aggregate of three or more company-wide performance metrics which provide for sliding scale incentives rather than an all-or-nothing approach; all such incentives have thresholds before they are paid and all are capped. The long-term incentives, consisting of performance shares, stock options and restricted stock units, have a three-year performance period or vesting period and consequently the value to executives varies with the Company's stock price over the period. The Company has a stock retention policy which requires retention of 75%50% of the net shares acquired upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock until stock ownership guidelines are met. The Company also has an executive clawback policy in the event of financial restatements due to fraud. The Company also has policies which prohibit the hedging or pledging of Company stock by directors and officers.

Human Resources Committee Report

        The Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on such review and discussion, has recommended to the board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Pay Ratio Information

        We are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) for our fiscal 2019. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with applicable securities regulations.

        For our fiscal year ended December 28, 2019:

•

The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our CEO) was $46,015.



•

The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was $4,872,938.



•

Based on this information, for 2019 the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 106 to 1.

        To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, we selected September 30, 2019 as the date for data gathering to identify the median employee because it enabled us to make such determination in a reasonably efficient and economical manner. We used the total cash compensation (base salary, cash bonuses and cash incentives) of all employees globally as reflected in payroll records. We identified our median employee using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all our employees included in the calculation.

        We did not use the same median employee as we did in 2018. That employee worked substantial overtime in 2019 and those changed circumstances resulted in unusually high compensation, which would not have been representative of our typical median employee and would have resulted in a significant change in our pay ratio.

        Once we identified our median employee, we combined all elements of such employee's compensation for 2019 to arrive at such employee's total compensation in the same manner as we arrived at our CEO's total compensation as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.

Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

Grants of
Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 20162019

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

Options Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal 20162019

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Director Compensation